Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Escalon council authorizes up to $74,270 contract with SCI for assessment‑district services

Escalon City Council · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a one‑year professional services agreement with SCI Consulting Group (not to exceed $74,270) to administer landscape and lighting districts and perform parcel audits; staff said DTA and Willdan were the other proposers and will provide RFP scoring upon request.

The Escalon City Council authorized a professional services agreement with SCI Consulting Group for assessment‑district engineering and administrative services not to exceed $74,270, with an initial one‑year term and an option to extend for an additional year.

Staff explained the contract covers parcel and Proposition 218 audits, annual administration of landscape and lighting district rolls, and a contingency to form a Community Facilities District for a proposed Murphy development. City staff said an RFP attracted three proposals — SCI, DTA (David Taussig & Associates) and Willdan — and the selection committee ranked SCI highest for a combination of local responsiveness, qualifications and cost competitiveness.

A councilmember requested greater transparency about the RFP process and asked to see the other proposals and the committee scoring rubric; staff agreed to provide the proposals and the evaluation tabulation to council upon request. The city manager explained the one‑year initial term with extension options was chosen to confirm mutual fit before committing to a longer engagement.

Councilmember Kaye moved to approve a resolution authorizing the city manager to execute the SCI contract in an amount not to exceed $74,270. The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.