Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Quabbin committee hears district MCAS data and prepares for state competency determination changes
Summary
Superintendent briefed the committee on district MCAS results and a likely statewide shift to a hybrid competency determination (end‑of‑course assessments plus portfolio/capstone), highlighted areas of strength in lower‑grade ELA and weaknesses in math and certain special‑education subgroups, and described action planning and curriculum review steps the district will take.
Quabbin Regional School District administrators told the school committee they are monitoring state plans to replace or supplement MCAS with a ‘‘competency determination’’ that would combine end‑of‑course assessments and a portfolio or capstone requirement, while warning that younger grades will continue to face MCAS‑style assessments "for now." Superintendent Colleen said state guidance is evolving but described a hybrid approach under consideration and stressed the district would avoid relying on a single test to determine student competency.
District staff presented local MCAS results showing ELA scores at or above the state in several elementary grades, while math remains a district area of need and will be subject to a curriculum review (Eureka Math is under review). Administrators singled out performance gaps for students with disabilities in specific grades (fourth, eighth and tenth), and said they will form school‑level action plans, do item‑by‑item MCAS analysis and use regular intervention cycles and professional development to address gaps.
Committee members pressed for clarity on timelines and costs. Members raised concerns about who will fund new assessments or portfolio evaluation if the state adopts the hybrid model; administrators said the cost question is unresolved and urged caution about assuming the state will fully cover implementation expenses. The committee noted MCAS nonparticipation affects accountability (the district cited a participation rate below 95 percent at one school), and members asked for communication plans to ensure families understand the continuing importance of assessments.
Administrators described several follow‑up measures: targeted item analysis to identify curriculum gaps (for example, earlier instruction on fractions), a planned math program curriculum review and possible pilots, continued use of intervention teams that meet every 6–8 weeks, and pursuit of grants (including a submitted early literacy tutoring grant) to support work in targeted grades. The committee and administration scheduled further curriculum and data briefings and emphasized that changes to graduation/competency rules will take time to implement.
