Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Richland 01 board approves $1.3M mowing contracts after questions about vendor vetting
Summary
The board voted 5-1 to award mowing contracts divided by lots to Edisto Landscaping Construction, Osmium Development Group and SCA of South Carolina LLC for an estimated $1.3 million; some commissioners raised concerns about vendor names and online presence and asked staff to confirm due diligence.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Richland 01 Board of School Commissioners on Nov. 11 approved a package of mowing contracts in an estimated combined amount of $1,300,000, awarding lots to Edisto Landscaping Construction, Osmium Development Group and SCA of South Carolina LLC.
During the presentation, district procurement staff said the work was procured through a competitive best-value process that weighted qualifications at 40% and price at 60% and divided the work into lots to allow smaller companies to compete. The administration described the award as a multi-term contract that begins Dec. 1 with four optional renewals.
"This is a mowing contract, and it isn't one firm. It's 3 firms ... we divided those into lots A through O so that we could give smaller companies the opportunity to bid," a district presenter told the board.
Several commissioners pressed staff about vendor identities and past performance after researching company names online. Commissioner Hersey asked why contract documents do not always appear with approvals and sought clarity about whether firms were umbrella entities; the presenter said the district conducted due diligence and that two of the three firms have provided prior services to the district, while one vendor (Osmium Development Group) is new but recommended by other local school districts.
Commissioner Wesson said she remained concerned about some listings and business names and cast the lone vote against the award. Chair Robert Lomenac noted that some large businesses use professional registered agents, which can make web searches less clear, and expressed support for the lot structure.
The motion passed with five ayes and one no. Board members asked administration to review any potential links to vendors the district had dealt with previously and to report back if further concerns emerged.

