Commission defers some ULDC changes, approves stormwater and mixed-use amendments

Panama City Commission · November 24, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Panama City Commissioners moved forward on several land-development code updates: they deferred administrative-review changes pending an appeals process, adopted stormwater/erosion-control updates, and approved a mixed-use zoning amendment while tabling other Gateway Overlay edits for revision.

At the Nov. 18 meeting, the Panama City Commission considered multiple Unified Land Development Code (ULDC) amendments and zoning items across several agenda entries.

Ordinance 32-85 (amending administrative development review procedures) drew public concern because it would shift some preliminary-plat authority from the planning board to a staff technical-review committee (TRC) and an administrative official. Public speakers and commissioners asked for a formal appeals mechanism and better reporting. The commission directed staff to draft appeal-process language and deferred the ordinance so the appeal language can be included; the motion to defer with instruction to add an appeals process passed 5-0.

Commissioners approved Ordinance 32-88, which revises developer stormwater and erosion-control plan standards and requires additional acceptance testing and post-construction groundwater monitoring. Commenters raised neighborhood drainage concerns; city engineering staff explained "freeboard" calculations, geotechnical borings and the need for monitoring wells to verify long-term roadway performance. The ordinance was adopted (vote 5-0).

Ordinance 32-89, revisions to mixed-use MU-2 bulk regulations, was adopted on second reading without public comment (vote 5-0).

Separately, Ordinance 32-94 (amendments to the Gateway Overlay allowing certain conditional uses while prohibiting others) was the subject of extended comment from commissioners and the public on visual impacts, clustering and the conditional-use review pathway. Commissioners directed staff to revise language and tabled the item to a future meeting so the planning board/architectural review process and the commission's role can be clarified (motion to table passed 5-0).

Several first readings and quasi-judicial items (annexation and land-use/zoning changes for specific parcels, including 1817 Beck Ave, 3719 Shoreline Circle, and 1310 Lincoln Drive) were advanced as first readings with no final votes.

What's next: Staff will return with a draft appeals process for administrative determinations and revised Gateway Overlay language addressing commissioners' concerns about conditional uses, architectural treatment and referral to the architectural review board. Several first-reading land-use items will return for second readings as scheduled.