Community speakers press board on immigration policy, training programs and legal costs
Loading...
Summary
More than two dozen public commenters addressed the board, with recurring themes: support for immigrant families and AB 495 protections, teacher safety and union bargaining, concerns about district spending on litigation and training, and heated accusations about board conduct and 'PRISM' training material.
Chino Valley Unified School District — Public comment at Tuesday’s board meeting featured more than 20 speakers who raised competing concerns about immigration enforcement near campuses, perceived threats from AB 495, teacher safety, union bargaining and district spending on outside training programs.
Speakers representing immigrant-support organizations and teachers urged the board to protect students and families affected by ICE actions and to adopt welcoming, trauma-informed policies; Marisol de Paolo and Rosa Belmont described community fear after recent immigration enforcement and urged support for AB 495 as a tool to keep children in their homes and schools during emergencies.
Other public comments came from union representatives and teachers who raised workplace safety issues and asked the board to negotiate on staffing and supports. Sarah Palmer of the Associated Chino Teachers praised district instruction but said teachers are experiencing an uptick in injuries from student behavioral incidents and requested increased support staff and safety protocols.
Several public speakers made pointed accusations about board members’ conduct, alleged censorship of teachers and questioned district legal spending. One commenter and several board members discussed invoices and state training materials identified in the meeting as "PRISM," with the board president sharply criticizing that program and alleging substantial state spending on content she described as inappropriate for classrooms.
There were also strongly partisan and personal remarks from some audience members, including direct accusations and name-calling toward board members and staff. The recording clerk reminded speakers of time limits and meeting conduct rules when several speakers exceeded their time or raised procedural conflicts.
What the board said Board members repeatedly thanked teachers and staff amid the contentious public comment period and the superintendent restated district protocol regarding outside agencies, saying that ICE is limited to school offices absent a court order and that the district would consult counsel when necessary.
Next steps Several public requests included asking the board to place items on future agendas (for example, adoption of a 'safe and welcoming schools' policy) and to continue negotiations with ACT. The board recorded no direct policy action during the public-comment period beyond later discussion and voting on the AB 495 resolution.
