Council discusses proposed limits on in-chamber photography; local journalists protest

The council held a study-session discussion of proposed revisions to its rules of procedure that would restrict live streaming, video recording and photography to the back of the chambers behind the final row of seating except when the presiding officer finds such activity non-disruptive.

Local journalists and experienced reporters, including Dan Shearer, spoke at the call to the public and opposed the proposed change, arguing it would relegate reporters and photographers to a "camera corral" and unfairly limit press access. Shearer called the rule an "overreaction," noting previous contentious meetings where the press had covered proceedings without such restrictions. Another former journalist, Dave Verweis, urged the council to delay action and consult with the press to avoid potential legal conflicts.

Council members debated the balance between preserving public access and preventing disruptive behavior. Several members (including a vice mayor and council representatives) said the town already has tools in its rules — verbal warnings, point of order, recessing a meeting and removal for continued disruption — and suggested better application and training rather than a prescriptive ban. Other council members described the behavior at a recent meeting as intentionally provocative and said more clarity about filming boundaries would help staff and the presiding officer manage future disruptions.

Staff clarified that the proposed language is meant to prevent disruptions and preserve sight lines for the public; it would not necessarily prevent staff photographers or explicitly invited photographers from occupying other positions. The matter was discussed but not acted on; the study session allowed council members to express preferences and ask staff to refine the language and enforcement steps.