Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Modular Homes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nixa council approves ordinance to allow modular homes in R‑1 single‑family districts
Summary
The council voted Nov. 25 to eliminate the RMHS district and allow factory‑built modular homes in R‑1 single‑family zones; the planning director and several residents debated definitions, aesthetics and potential impacts on property values before the measure passed with one member opposed.
The Nixa City Council on Nov. 25 approved an ordinance to allow factory‑built modular homes in the city’s R‑1 single‑family zoning district, removing a separate RMHS district and amending definitions and development standards.
Planning and development director Scott Gavi told the council the change is intended to update code language so modular homes — distinct from mobile homes — can be built on typical single‑family lots without being subject to a two‑acre minimum. "This is strictly for modular homes, not mobile homes," Gavi said, explaining that modular units arrive with building‑code documentation and are constructed off site, which can shorten construction time and reduce neighborhood disruption.
During the public hearing residents asked whether used or modified shipping‑container houses would qualify under the new definition, whether property values might be affected and how the change aligns with the city’s comprehensive plan. Real‑estate agent Sandy Caron urged the council to consider impacts on surrounding property values; Scott Jones and Ron Sanders asked clarifying questions about definitions and plan consistency.
Gavi said no properties are currently zoned RMHS and that the planning and zoning commission recommended approval. Council members discussed distinctions between modular and mobile homes, aesthetics (not controlled by city code) and potential affordability benefits.
On a roll call vote the ordinance passed: Jay Ortiz, Kelly Morris, Aaron Peterson and Shawn Lucas voted "Yes"; Darlene Graham voted "No." The council did not record any formal amendments to the ordinance at the meeting.
The ordinance moves to implementation steps outlined by staff, including any necessary updates to permitting processes and public information on the distinction between modular and mobile home regulations.
