Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dawsonville planning commission approves rezoning for 35.31-acre Cornerstone extension with conditions

City of Dawsonville Planning Commission · December 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission on June 10 approved ZAC2600057 to rezone 35.31 acres (parcel 083025006) from AP to R‑3, limiting development to 91 homes with staff‑recommended conditions including a traffic study, stream buffers and minimum 1,500 sq ft heated-floor area.

The City of Dawsonville Planning Commission on June 10, 2025 voted to approve a zoning map amendment (ZAC2600057) that will rezone a 35.31‑acre tract (tax parcel 083025006) from AP (Annex Property District) to R‑3 single‑family residential, subject to conditions recommended by staff.

Dana Spayde of CPL Engineering summarized the application and staff report and told the commission, "staff recommends approval with conditions of the requested zoning map amendment." The applicant proposes the property be developed as a phase‑extension of the Cornerstone subdivision and capped at 91 principal dwelling units (a density of 2.6 units per acre) under the stipulated conditions; at the code maximum density (3 units/acre) the parcel could yield up to 105 residences absent the stipulation.

Why it matters: the rezoning will permit a single‑family subdivision adjacent to existing and planned neighborhoods and will require infrastructure and environmental conditions before final platting. Staff conditions include a traffic impact study, stream protection setbacks, a minimum heated‑floor area higher than the code minimum and façade materials standards.

Key conditions and technical points

- Unit cap: the approved stipulation limits development on the site to no more than 91 principal dwelling units, reducing the effective maximum density from 3 units/acre to 2.6 units/acre. - Housing size: the applicant proposed a 1,500 sq ft minimum heated floor area; the staff report and Clark Patterson recommendations were cited in discussion of square‑footage percentages. - Buffers and setbacks: staff recommended a 50‑foot undisturbed stream buffer and a 25‑foot impervious setback on each side of existing streams, with limited exceptions for required sanitary sewer lines and easements. - Stormwater and emergency access: the development is proposed to be served by public sewer and water; the fire marshal’s comments require fire apparatus access roads and hydrant placement per the 2018 International Fire Code (with Georgia amendments) and the Dawson County Fire Ordinance. - Traffic study and access: the code requires two access points and a traffic study once a project exceeds 125 lots; staff conditioned that a traffic impact study be completed and that any study recommendations about access points be implemented or approved during land‑disturbance permitting.

What speakers said

Applicant/developer representative Corey Guthrie said the rezoning is intended "as a phase 3 of Cornerstone and not so much Thunder Ridge," noting the same development team is handling Cornerstone and the proposed phase. Michael Turner, identified as "general partner for B & K Turner Family LLP," described the parcel as bounded by the City of Atlanta to the west, Thunder Ridge to the east and Cornerstone to the south and asked the commission to approve the application.

Staff explained why some buffers were proposed to be located within lots and warned about long‑term maintenance and enforcement issues if buffers are not platted outside lots. Spayde also relayed the fire marshal’s requirements and noted that the submitted plans show proposed right‑of‑way and an emergency access that will be addressed during plan review.

Decision and next steps

A motion to approve the applicant’s request with the conditions presented by CPL was moved and seconded; the chair announced, "It is approved." The transcript does not record individual vote tallies. The item will next be scheduled for a City Council public hearing on 01/05/2026, where council members will consider the same rezoning at the legislative level.

The Planning Commission’s approval is conditional; final design, traffic‑study implementation, platting, and land‑disturbance permit approvals remain part of the subsequent review process.