Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Preservation Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Holyoke CPA forms subcommittee to address enforcement of preservation restrictions
Summary
The CPA committee moved to form a small subcommittee to research enforcement options for preservation restrictions currently held by the historical commission and to consult with the building department, solicitor, and mayor.
Committee members debated whether the historical commission should remain the holder of preservation restrictions or whether enforcement duties should be shifted. Chris, representing historical-commission interests, said enforcement and technical inspections are beyond the commission’s expertise and that the commission has had limited success getting help from the building department.
Michael and others argued the historical commission was intended as a filter to identify historically significant proposals, not as an enforcement agency. Meg proposed the historical commission remain the holder of restrictions but have technical work—inspections or consultant support—handled by city staff or by a paid consultant funded via the CPA administrative budget if necessary.
Helene moved to create a small subcommittee to brainstorm oversight and enforcement options; the motion passed on roll call. The chair said the subcommittee (Helene and Chris) will reach out to the building department, the solicitor’s office and the mayor for guidance and to report back with options.
Next steps: the subcommittee will research other cities’ models, explore whether the CPA can fund consultant inspections, and consult the building department and solicitor’s office. Committee staff offered administrative support.
