District presents first interim budget: lower property-tax growth and midyear salary timing tighten but unrestricted balance remains positive

Mountain View-Los Altos Union High · December 16, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff reported a first interim budget that reflects lower-than-assumed secured property-tax growth and the timing effect of a recently negotiated 4% salary increase; staff said unrestricted ending balance remains slightly positive while some restricted grant accounts are being spent down.

At the board’s December meeting, fiscal staff presented the district’s first interim budget report (snapshot as of Oct. 31), explaining why the adopted budget differs from current-year projections and how the district is projecting finances across multiple years.

Elvis Lopez (Director of Fiscal Services) and staff told trustees secured property-tax receipts came in below the adopted-budget assumption (about 3.89% growth versus the 5% used in the adopted budget), reducing revenue by roughly $1.2 million. At the same time, a 4% salary increase negotiated after the adopted budget raised personnel costs and explained most of the increase in expenditures versus the adopted budget. Staff noted one-time state grant revenue (around $1.3 million) is recorded in restricted funds and will be spent down for the purposes specified by the grants.

On the unrestricted general fund, staff said the first-interim projection shows a modest positive ending balance (about $379,000 under the current assumptions) and that the multiyear projection meets the board’s 3% reserve requirement under the assumptions presented. Staff emphasized that assumptions (property-tax growth, staffing changes, health-benefit inflation, and any future negotiated raises) materially affect multiyear projections and that the board will review a second interim in March.

The board accepted the first interim report by motion. Trustees asked for further detail on one-time versus ongoing revenues, the carryover accounting for restricted funds, and sensitivity scenarios for alternate property-tax assumptions.