Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nrse Form And Easement Disclosure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission pushes for stronger NRSE form, clearer historic‑agreement disclosure
Summary
Franklin City’s Environmental and Parks Commission reviewed a draft Natural Resource Special Exception (NRSE) application form and asked staff to add requirements: clear exhibit maps, recorded document references for conservation easements, an executive summary, credentials for technical reports, and a commission definition of 'self‑imposed.'
Chair Jesse Valdez convened the Environmental and Parks Commission on Dec. 8 to review a draft application and review form intended for Natural Resource Special Exceptions (NRSEs). Staff said the draft pairs applicant responses with a separate space for commission findings and was modeled in part on Department of Natural Resources questionnaires but tailored to local rules.
Commissioners repeatedly pressed for greater transparency tied to parcel history, asking that the form require applicants to list recorded document numbers for any conservation easements or prior land‑use agreements attached to the property. One commissioner said that developers sometimes seek exceptions years after the original approvals, and ‘‘we need that information to stay with the land so we understand what was previously agreed to.’’ Staff acknowledged that easements are recorded with the register of deeds and agreed to add a clear exhibit requirement and explicit instructions about referencing recorded documents.
Members also asked the form to capture who prepared technical submittals — for example, wetland delineations and natural resource protection plans — and to include a credentials page for delineators and engineers. Staff noted wetland delineations must generally be prepared by an assurance delineator and suggested that delineations and surveys be no older than five years.
On substance, commissioners asked the commission to define the statutory phrase often called 'self‑imposed' so the panel can consistently evaluate whether limiting conditions arose from the property or were imposed by the current applicant. Staff agreed to draft a proposed definition and to add subheaders in the findings area to clarify expectations (existing conditions, applicant responses, staff comments, commission findings).
Commissioners proposed adding an executive summary and side‑by‑side visual exhibits showing existing and proposed conditions so the commission can focus on the specific parcel area affected rather than parsing voluminous attachments. Staff said the administrative form could be implemented quickly and returned a revised draft for the next meeting; changes that would alter the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) itself would be pursued separately if needed.
The commission requested the following concrete additions to the NRSE packet: a requirement that applicants reference recorded conservation easement document numbers on drawings; an executive summary and map exhibit showing existing and proposed conditions; a credentials appendix for technical consultants; a staff analysis section in the staff report that is kept separate from the applicant’s responses; and a drafted definition of 'self‑imposed' for commission review. Staff committed to circulating a revised form ahead of the next meeting.
