Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residency Investigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Lewiston School Committee to investigate members' residency and urge hiring-review
Summary
Multiple residents and at least two committee members urged an investigation into allegations about a member's residency eligibility and called for a review of Lewiston Public Schools' hiring practices; commenters warned of legal and reputational consequences and asked the committee to act rather than defer.
At a Dec. 1 Lewiston School Committee meeting, several residents and committee members called for a formal investigation into questions about a committee member's residency eligibility and urged the district to review hiring practices.
Janet Boden, speaking during the public comment period, said declining to investigate a formal residency complaint "sends a message that we are unwilling to uphold our own standards" and argued that a Ward 5 member should have recused from a prior vote because participation "creates an appearance that the process was not fair or transparent." Megan Hurd, a committee member, said she voted to move forward with an investigation and told the committee, "Accountability does not have an expiration date."
Speakers tied the call for investigation to broader concerns about process and oversight. Lisa Jones accused the board of "unethical and corrupt behavior" and said state and national attention is focused on Lewiston; Kieran Madures Collins, an attorney, warned that alleged breaches of executive-session confidentiality could expose the committee and district to liability. Melissa Dunn described alleged harassment and intimidation tactics and urged the committee to use existing protocol to address such behavior.
Several commenters urged a separate, committee-led review of Lewiston Public Schools' hiring practices. Cara Korshane asked the committee to direct the superintendent to conduct a thorough review, noting the district recently added application questions about prior investigations and suggesting anticipated state legislation may change obligations for schools and the Maine Department of Education.
The committee did not take formal action on the calls for investigation during the meeting. Members noted procedural reviews and hiring-policy items will appear on future agendas, with procedural rules scheduled for the first January meeting and discussion of a hiring review mentioned as a possible follow-up.
The public comment period was governed by the committee's BEDH policy; speakers were reminded of a three-minute time limit and that comments must not name specific students or staff. The meeting moved into executive session later in the agenda for a student disciplinary hearing.
