Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Refunding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Arlington ISD approves order to pursue refunding bonds after 2019 bond update
Summary
Trustees authorized staff to prepare and issue refunding bonds after hearing a detailed update on the 2019 bond program and projected savings. Financial advisers said a $10 million contribution would boost annual debt-service savings to roughly $1 million; board approved consultant appointments and an authorizing order.
Get email alerts on the Finance Refunding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees for the Arlington Independent School District on Nov. 6 approved a resolution directing staff to prepare for the issuance and sale of refunding bonds and adopted an order authorizing unlimited-tax refunding bonds, after hearing a detailed update on the district’s 2019 bond program.
Superintendent Doctor Smith introduced Financial Advisor George Willaford and bond counsel Sam Gill, who presented options to refund callable principal across multiple series. Willaford said the most attractive savings opportunity centered on callable maturities from the district’s 2017 series and that including portions of the 2015 and 2016 issues could raise the refunded principal to about $74.855 million. At market assumptions shown to the board, straight refinancing was illustrated to produce roughly $440,000 in annual debt-service savings (about $7.17 million total), and a proposal to contribute $10 million of district cash would raise projected annual savings to about $1.01 million and increase present-value savings (Willaford cited a roughly 7.1% present-value savings figure for the refunded amount).
Trustee Haynes moved to appoint the recommended consultant team to prepare for issuance; Trustee Wilbanks seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Later, Trustee Fowler moved to adopt the order authorizing refunding bonds; the motion was seconded and approved 6–0.
Board members asked questions about sensitivity to market volatility. Willaford presented a sensitivity analysis showing savings would shrink if market yields rose (he noted examples of 20–30 basis-point swings and associated impacts on present-value savings) and said the finance team had scheduled rating agency calls and a possible pricing window in the weeks after Thanksgiving, contingent on market conditions.
The board also heard the district’s 2019 bond program update from Kelly Horn, who said about 104 projects remain active across phases and project managers, with most phase 4 and phase 5 projects moving from design into bidding and many expected to be under construction next summer. Horn reported projected interest earnings of roughly $34–$35 million as of Oct. 1 and reported hub participation at about 24.24%, with a district goal to finish the program with 25–30% participation.
What’s next: With the board’s authorization, staff will proceed with consultant engagement, rating-agency outreach and monitoring market conditions; bond pricing would be scheduled only if market conditions align with the district’s targeted savings thresholds.

