Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Utilities Regulatory Authority adopts consent calendars, designates presiding officers
Summary
At a remote meeting on Dec. 3, 2025, the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority adopted a four-item decision consent calendar and approved two presiding-officer appointments by unanimous roll calls; mover and seconder were not named in the transcript.
Tom Wheel, who identified himself as interim chairman of the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, opened the authority’s remote meeting on Dec. 3, 2025, at 9 a.m. and listed attending commissioners.
The authority approved a decision consent calendar containing four items after a motion and second that were not identified by name in the transcript. A roll call recorded affirmative votes from Chairman Veil; Vice Chairman David Arconti; Commissioner Jan Beecher; Commissioner Michael Karen; and Commissioner Holly Cheeseman. The chair stated, "The consent calendar has been adopted in full." The transcript does not specify the mover or the member who seconded the motion.
The meeting then considered a second consent calendar to appoint presiding or hearing officers for two panels. That motion was also moved and seconded (neither mover nor seconder is named in the record) and passed by the same recorded affirmative roll-call votes. The authority announced that the panels assigned to those items had designated presiding officers.
The meeting concluded with an announcement that the next regular remote meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025, at 9 a.m. The transcript contains no further substantive discussion, public testimony, or contested debate on the items.
Notes on record keeping: the transcript presents an internal inconsistency in chair references. Tom Wheel is recorded at the start as identifying himself as interim chairman; during roll call the transcript uses the name "Chairman Veil." The published article reports the names and votes as they appear in the provided transcript and does not assume those two names refer to the same individual.
