Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
PURA hearing: OCC challenges confidentiality of financing exhibit, cites Connecticut statute 16-43
Summary
At a continuation of docket 25-0811, the Office of Consumer Counsel argued that portions of Charter's late-filed Exhibit 18 are improperly marked confidential because they describe assets pledged in financing agreements that OCC says Connecticut General Statute 16-43 requires the authority to review; Charter disagreed and the commission took the protective-order motion under advisement.
The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority heard competing arguments over whether parts of Charter Communications’ late-filed exhibit should remain confidential and whether financing documents pledging subsidiary assets fall within the commission’s review.
Bert Cohen of the Office of Consumer Counsel told commissioners the late-filed Exhibit 18 was not financial ‘‘there's no numbers, no interest rate calculations, or anything like that,’’ and said the exhibit appears to disclose which public-service-company assets are…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
