Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Overlake Commons topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Overlake Commons proposal: up to 830 units near Overlake Village station; study session set for Jan. 27
Summary
Planning staff presented a consolidated application for an 8–9‑story, up to 830‑unit Overlake Commons development at 29561 52nd Avenue NE, vested to 2024 code standards; the council scheduled a study session Jan. 27 and a public hearing Feb. 17 and asked staff to address tree preservation, parking, decarbonization incentives and potential displacement of senior housing.
Get email alerts on the Overlake Commons topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planning staff gave the Committee of the Whole a preliminary overview Dec. 2 of the Overlake Commons master plan, development agreement and site‑plan entitlement application.
Carol Helland, Planning & Community Development Director, and Senior Planner Alex Hunt said the consolidated application proposes an 8–9‑story multifamily project with up to 830 residential units at 29561 52nd Avenue NE — the current site of the Overlake Terrace senior and assisted‑living facility — immediately across from the Overlake Village light‑rail station. Hunt said the project would be vested to 2024 zoning standards and that next steps include a study session on Jan. 27 and a public hearing with potential council action on Feb. 17.
Council members asked detailed procedural and policy questions. Staff reminded the council the matter is quasi‑judicial and that any communications outside open meetings must be disclosed to preserve the appearance of fairness. Council Vice President Forsyth asked whether a cluster of significant trees south of the entry drive could be preserved rather than cleared; Council President Kritzer asked staff to address tree exception procedures, administrative design flexibilities (including solid‑waste collection and ground‑level uses), and to include a slide on proposed public benefits tied to incentives such as decarbonization and affordable‑housing commitments.
Council members also asked how vesting to older code relates to the Redmond 2050 goals and noted the application’s lower parking ratio across from transit. Staff and the chair urged council members to submit written questions before the Jan. 7 deadline so they can be addressed at the Jan. 27 study session. The planning commission had previously raised concerns about potential displacement of senior housing; staff said that issue will be part of the forthcoming review.
Next steps: study session Jan. 27; public hearing and potential decision Feb. 17. The item remains quasi‑judicial; council members were reminded to disclose ex parte contacts as required.

