Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regional Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sherburne County seeks clearer reporting and a possible levy cap for St. Cloud Regional Airport Authority; governance changes left for later
Summary
County administrators presented a white paper on communication and governance issues related to the St. Cloud Regional Airport Authority. Commissioners agreed on stronger reporting from appointed authority representatives, discussed options to add ex officio or elected officials to the authority and signaled openness to a levy cap pending more information.
Sherburne County reviewed a multi-jurisdiction white paper on early governance and communication issues with the newly formed St. Cloud Regional Airport Authority and discussed options ranging from improved reporting to joint-powers amendments.
Administrators from the four founding jurisdictions summarized issues and proposed remedies that could be pursued either under the current joint-powers structure, via a voluntary memorandum of understanding (MOU), or through amendment of the joint-powers resolution. Options included: sharing board agendas and packets more consistently; scheduling regular briefings from appointed authority representatives; appointing ex officio (non-voting) elected officials to authority meetings; permitting appointing bodies the option to appoint an elected official; or formally amending the joint-powers agreement to require an elected official seat.
Several commissioners emphasized the importance of accountability given the authority's taxing powers. One commissioner said he "really struggle[s] with appointed boards having taxation authority without having elected officials on the board," and others asked for more information about the airport authority’s long-term financial plan before agreeing to a specific levy cap. Administrators proposed that an MOU could be used quickly to formalize reporting and representation steps while preserving the option to amend the joint-powers agreement later if desired.
The county board reached consensus to request stronger reporting back from authority appointees and asked staff to gather more information about the authority's long-range financing before supporting a levy cap; staff will circulate the white paper to the other three jurisdictions and return with consolidated feedback.
