Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Votes at a glance: Board of Equalization approves roll corrections, consent matters and Netleaf reduction; denies Pio Pico and SCE petitions

November 24, 2025 | Board of Equalization, Other State Agencies, Executive, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Votes at a glance: Board of Equalization approves roll corrections, consent matters and Netleaf reduction; denies Pio Pico and SCE petitions
The California State Board of Equalization moved through several administrative and adjudicatory items on Nov. 19, recording roll-call votes on routine and contested matters.

Item 2: The board approved corrections to the state-assessed roll for a Santa Clara County parcel covering 2022–2025 as presented by the State Assessed Properties Division. Member Vasquez moved to approve; Member Schaeffer seconded. The roll call recorded ayes from Chairman Gaines, Vice chair Lieber, Member Vasquez, Member Schaeffer and Controller Cohen; the motion passed.

Item 3: Two nonappearance consent property-tax petitions for reassessment of 2025 unitary value were presented as staff-recommended joint resolutions and adopted in a single voice vote. Member Vasquez moved and Member Schaeffer seconded; roll call was unanimous.

Item 4: The board denied Pio Pico Energy Center LLC’s 2025 petition based on the appeals attorney’s summary decision; Member Schaeffer moved, Vice chair Lieber seconded, and the roll call was unanimous in favor of denial.

Item 5: Netleaf Fiber Holdings LLC’s 2025 petition was resolved by agreement; SAPD presented a parties’ agreed recommendation reducing unitary value to $96,000,000, which the board adopted by roll call.

Item 6: After an extended oral hearing on Southern California Edison’s 2025 petition, the board denied the petition and affirmed the 2025 board-adopted unitary value by a 4–1 vote (Chairman Gaines dissenting). The appeals attorney will prepare the written decision under Revenue & Taxation Code §40.

All votes were recorded on the transcript and by roll call during the meeting. The board recessed for a one-hour lunch and planned to reconvene after 1:13 p.m.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal