Board reviews use-of-force reporting, training and statewide oversight consortium

Ithaca City Police Oversight Board (unattributed) · December 18, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed the department’s use-of-force forms, supervisory review practices, annual training requirements and the New York State oversight consortium; members asked how camera footage and reporting interact to trigger training or investigations.

Board members and police staff reviewed how use-of-force incidents are documented, how supervisors review reports and video, and how both training and internal affairs follow from those reviews.

Speakers described the reporting chain: an officer completes a use-of-force form that becomes part of the incident report; sergeants and lieutenants review the documentation and can trigger coaching, additional training or internal investigations if issues are found. “Once the form is completed, it’s reviewed by sergeant … the lieutenant reviews that, and he comes upstairs, for a final review,” Speaker 3 said.

State context and standards: presenters noted New York State now collects use-of-force data and that local forms reflect state requirements; the group contrasted the absence of single national standards with New York’s steps to standardize reporting and training. Speaker 5 referenced the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement materials for additional guidance.

Camera footage and verification: staff described a review process in which supervisors search upload logs and 24-hour windows to confirm whether body-worn cameras recorded an incident; missing uploads are identified by supervisors and may prompt follow-up when an officer emails that a device failed to upload.

What’s next: board members asked staff to continue providing written reports for minutes and to circulate the statewide consortium wrap-up recording so members who missed the meeting can review it; the public meeting closed as the board prepared to discuss specific cases in executive session.

Ending note: No formal policy changes or votes were recorded; the board requested follow-up material and vendor responses to outstanding technical questions.