Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Repeal And Cannabis Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission repeals Eddy County business-license ordinance and updates cannabis rules to remove licensing reference
Summary
The Eddy County Commission voted to repeal the county business-license ordinance and approved an amendment to the county cannabis ordinance that removed references to the county business license; staff said state licensing requirements remain unchanged and no public comments were received on either item.
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Repeal And Cannabis Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Eddy County Commission opened two consecutive public hearings and approved an ordinance repealing the county business license ordinance and a companion amendment to the county cannabis ordinance to remove references to the county business license requirement.
At the public hearing on the business-license ordinance repeal, staff explained the repeal followed a commission recommendation and that the ordinance repeal had been recommended unanimously when proposed. No members of the public spoke on the item.
Immediately afterward, the commission opened a public hearing on the cannabis ordinance (O-25-144). Staff said the cannabis ordinance was reprinted from the 2021 version and the only substantive change was removing the county business-license references; paragraphs were renumbered. When Commissioner Carlson asked whether state licenses were still required, staff replied that the state requirements remained and county business-license references were the only items removed.
Both items were approved by motion and roll-call vote. Commissioners recorded in roll calls on these items include Carlson, Trost, Klein, Bowen and Owen.
Why it matters: Repealing the county business-license ordinance removes a county-level licensing step that staff said had been required by the cannabis ordinance. Staff emphasized that state licensing requirements for cannabis activities remain in force.
What the record shows: There were no public commenters on these hearings. Staff described the changes as narrowly focused on removing the local business-license cross-reference and renumbering the ordinance text; no other substantive regulatory changes were proposed in the cannabis ordinance amendment.

