Southborough committee targets EMC/Deerfoot/Bartolini parcels and betterment options for wastewater plant

Town of Southborough Wastewater Committee · December 19, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee discussed candidate sites (EMC/Dell parcels, Deerfoot Road and Bartolini land), leach-field sizing and financing tools including betterment and an internal parcel/GIS spreadsheet to support a FY27 town meeting ask.

The Town of Southborough wastewater committee focused on locating a feasible treatment and leaching site and refining financing tools for a sewer/district concept along Route 9. Members reviewed an 11-foot printed Route 9 map and an Al-created spreadsheet of parcels and agreed to expand the dataset and run GIS queries to prioritize parcels that could realistically connect.

Site candidates discussed included EMC/Dell-owned land, an MBTA parcel that previously drew developer interest, Deerfoot Road properties and land described as the Bartolini (Parleini) parcel. One committee member said some EMC/Dell parcels may be negotiable and could include bargaining chips such as road takeovers or easement transfers. The committee emphasized the need for permission to conduct soil/perk testing on candidate parcels as an immediate next step.

Technical sizing: Engineers on the committee shared a scaling example from a nearby Madison Place project: about 1 acre of leaching area supported ~27,900 gpd. Using that example, committee members estimated roughly 10 acres for a 300,000-gpd target under favorable soils; in poorer soils the requirement could rise toward ~30 acres. One member warned, ‘‘you really probably throw out the site’’ if many parcels show low percolation rates.

Financing and process notes: The committee reviewed the state betterment guidance and discussed staging betterment work once a site, system design and timeline are sufficiently developed. Members also noted developer mitigation contributions (cited: an example of $1.7 million in off-site infrastructure from a nearby project) and saw opportunities to combine town funds, potential state grants and developer contributions. The committee agreed to: - Expand the parcel spreadsheet with parcel numbers, ownership, acreage and estimated development/tax revenue value; - Run GIS color-coding to identify a priority district (likely focused on commercial/industrial parcels along Route 9 rather than broad residential zones); - Seek permissions and conduct perk/soil testing on candidate parcels during the near term; - Track tasks in a OneDrive repository with a read-only public reference to avoid open-meeting law issues.

The committee set the next meeting for Jan. 15 and adjourned after approving minutes and routine closing motions.