Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves annexation of roughly 66 acres after developer presentation; Arbor Homes outlines timeline

Greenwood Common Council · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Greenwood's council approved Ordinance 25-30 to annex approximately 66.45 acres into the city and added planning-commission commitments; developer Arbor Homes presented plans for roughly 62.45 acres and a phased build timeline beginning in late 2026.

The Greenwood Common Council voted 8–0 to approve Ordinance 25-30, annexing roughly 66.45 acres into Greenwood and incorporating planning-commission commitments agreed during the meeting.

The annexation resolution and ordinance were discussed in tandem with a developer presentation by Tony Vagaro of Arbor Homes. Vagaro described the property as "about 62.45 acres of undeveloped area," and said the developer plans up to 164 single-family homes on the site with a gross density reported as "2.47 acres" per unit in his presentation (developer-supplied density figure). He said the proposal would include multiple public access points, roughly 8.79 acres of non-pond common open space, about six acres of pond for a total of 15.57 acres of open space and a mix of ranch and two-story home plans. Vagaro gave an anticipated construction timeline that would begin infrastructure work in late 2026 and advance toward buildout around 2030.

Council amended the ordinance to add planning-commission recommended commitments (five recommended commitments plus a sixth proposed by Mr. Hopper) before the second-reading vote. Staff noted the parcel lies partly inside and partly outside current city/county limits and described the annexation as filling a gap in the city's boundaries.

Council members asked questions about tree removal and parcel configuration; staff and the developer acknowledged an on-screen exhibit had a boundary line that needed correction and said they would clarify tree preservation and the primary plat during the permitting process. The ordinance passed second reading, as amended, 8–0.

Next steps: the developer must submit a primary plat and coordinate with city planning and engineering on access points, stormwater, tree preservation and right-of-way dedications contained in the planning-commission commitments.