Audit of draft article against issues rules

Checklist results (categories listed with findings):

spelling: [{"type":"transcript_spelling_inconsistency","description":"The transcript alternates between 'Frays' and 'Frase' for one commissioner; article uses 'Frase' as the corrected form.","severity":"minor"}]

clarity: []

chronology: []

framing: []

misinformation: [{"type":"statute_citation_unspecified","description":"The draft references statute numbers in spoken form (e.g., '6092115'); article clarifies these as Minn. Stat. sections where possible but flags 'pre-sentence investigation statute' as 'not specified' in the transcript.","severity":"moderate"}]

misidentification: [{"type":"vote_roster_ambiguity","description":"The roll-call sections of the transcript contain inconsistent present/absent calls (for example, Moore initially noted 'absent' then later 'here', and 'Warren' appears in the roll call). The article avoids assigning a definitive vote to contradictory entries and reports the chair's announcement of an 8-0 vote instead of listing uncertain individual votes as definitive.","severity":"moderate"}]

out_of_context: []

Quantitative precision: [{"type":"bed_projection_precision","description":"Article reports projected bed impacts (875 projected, 41 offset, net ~834) as staff estimates and attributes them to Director Reitz; numbers are presented as approximate and method-based.","severity":"minor"}]

Process clarity: []

Context clarity: []

Agency clarity: []

Question emphasis: []

omission: [{"type":"footnote_unborn_child_handling","description":"The draft initially implied the unborn-child footnote might be part of the recommendation; audit notes that staff described it as a commission-interest footnote not part of the recommendation and the article was clarified accordingly.","severity":"minor"}]

bias: []

duplicate: []

Attribution lock: []