Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit of draft article against issues rules
Summary
Audit of the draft article identified a small set of issues (speaker-name inconsistency in transcript, some statute citation clarity needed, vote roster ambiguity). The article was revised to address these issues.
Checklist results (categories listed with findings):
spelling: [{"type":"transcript_spelling_inconsistency","description":"The transcript alternates between 'Frays' and 'Frase' for one commissioner; article uses 'Frase' as the corrected form.","severity":"minor"}]
clarity: []
chronology: []
framing: []
misinformation: [{"type":"statute_citation_unspecified","description":"The draft references statute numbers in spoken form (e.g., '6092115'); article clarifies these as Minn. Stat. sections where possible but flags 'pre-sentence investigation statute' as 'not specified' in the transcript.","severity":"moderate"}]
misidentification: [{"type":"vote_roster_ambiguity","description":"The roll-call sections of the transcript contain inconsistent present/absent calls (for example, Moore initially noted 'absent' then later 'here', and 'Warren' appears in the roll call). The article avoids assigning a definitive vote to contradictory entries and reports the chair's announcement of an 8-0 vote instead of listing uncertain individual votes as definitive.","severity":"moderate"}]
out_of_context: []
Quantitative precision: [{"type":"bed_projection_precision","description":"Article reports projected bed impacts (875 projected, 41 offset, net ~834) as staff estimates and attributes them to Director Reitz; numbers are presented as approximate and method-based.","severity":"minor"}]
Process clarity: []
Context clarity: []
Agency clarity: []
Question emphasis: []
omission: [{"type":"footnote_unborn_child_handling","description":"The draft initially implied the unborn-child footnote might be part of the recommendation; audit notes that staff described it as a commission-interest footnote not part of the recommendation and the article was clarified accordingly.","severity":"minor"}]
bias: []
duplicate: []
Attribution lock: []
