Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Batavia council approves demolition of River Street smokestack amid preservation debate

Batavia City Council · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council voted 11–3 to approve a certificate of appropriateness allowing demolition of a deteriorated 110-foot chimney at 25–31 North River Street after hearing engineer reports that described interior structural failure and preservationists’ calls to explore restoration and grant options.

The Batavia City Council approved a certificate of appropriateness to demolish a deteriorated 110-foot chimney at 25–31 North River Street, voting 11–3 after extended public comment and council debate.

Property owner Claire Keane presented an engineering assessment that found significant interior deterioration — including visible light through the liner, cracking and corroded members — and described the structure as a safety risk. Keane said specialists who examine chimneys concluded the chimney was not structurally sound and that some repair techniques were infeasible. “We have to go inside, we have to look at it... and once he went inside, that's where he got the photos, where you can see the light through it,” Keane said, summarizing the engineer’s findings.

Preservation advocates urged the city to pursue alternatives. Kate Garrett of the local history museum testified that the chimney is part of downtown Batavia’s historic fabric: “Once you lose your history, a monument does not replace it,” she said, urging the council to seek restoration estimates and possible grant funding before authorizing full demolition.

Members of the Historic Preservation Commission had recommended a partial demolition to 22 feet 7 inches—removing the highest, compromised portion while retaining a lower segment—so that a remnant could be stabilized and interpreted. Council members who voted to allow the full demolition said a safety-focused engineering assessment and the risk of prolonged vacancy supported removal; others cautioned that the city had not exhausted grant and rehabilitation pathways and asked staff to develop a preservation funding strategy.

By approving the certificate of appropriateness, the council authorized the owner to proceed with demolition under city permit requirements. Several aldermen asked staff to include historic-preservation funding options and a broader River Street review on future committee agendas.