Commission reviews six‑story Avenue E housing plan and Clayton Block parking proposal

Bayonne Historic Preservation Commission · December 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed a six‑story, 105‑unit proposal for 102–116 Avenue E and a separate plan to replace Clayton Block with a parking lot; staff will submit either comments or no‑objection letters and raised a caveat about telephonic equipment near Bayonne High School.

At its Dec. 1 meeting, the Bayonne Historic Preservation Commission reviewed two development proposals included in the meeting packet: a six‑story multifamily project at 102–116 Avenue E and a plan to convert the former Clayton Block site on Route 440/New Hook Road into a parking lot.

Staff described the Avenue E application as a six‑story residential building with 105 units, 110 parking spaces, 53 bicycle spaces and roughly 4,394 square feet of indoor amenity space plus outdoor terraces, a green roof and loading zone. Commissioners indicated some packet comments had been filed; several commissioners said they had no objection to filing a “no comment” or “no objection” response as appropriate.

The Clayton Block proposal was summarized as a simpler redevelopment: removal of the existing building and conversion of the site into surface parking. Commissioners asked staff to pass along minor aesthetic and historical suggestions where feasible.

The packet also included a notice about telephonic/communications equipment proposed atop Bayonne High School. Commissioners reported they had no objection in principle so long as the installation would not endanger the high school’s structure or its occupants; staff said they would forward either the recorded no‑comment response or specific comments as needed.

No formal votes on project approvals were recorded in the transcript; the commission’s role at this meeting was to review correspondence and confirm whether to send comments to state or city review bodies.