Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Phoenix council pauses vote on state-mandated middle-housing rules after hours of public testimony
Summary
After a multi-hour public hearing with dozens of pro- and anti-middle-housing speakers, Phoenix City Council voted to continue two state-required zoning items (51–52) to Nov. 19 so staff and council can address concerns about historic neighborhoods, parking and enforcement.
Phoenix City Council on Wednesday delayed action on two zoning items meant to implement Arizona’s new middle-housing law, choosing to continue the measures to Nov. 19 after an extended public hearing that drew hundreds of residents.
The items — a text amendment to revise the zoning code and a companion rezoning to convey rights for middle housing near downtown — were presented by Planning Deputy Director Tricia Gomes, who said state law requires municipalities to allow duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes on single-family lots in specified areas and warned the city risks losing local zoning controls if it does not adopt compliant rules by Jan. 1, 2026.
“Once again, this is for new subdivisions only,” Gomes said in her staff presentation, summarizing the law’s requirements and the staff-recommended overlay and procedural changes.
The public hearing that followed lasted several hours. Supporters argued the changes would expand housing options near transit and jobs and help younger residents and workers remain in the city. “Middle housing is one of the best ways we can address this shortage,” said Micah Cadiz, a resident of the Evans Churchill neighborhood. Several speakers representing housing-advocacy groups and labor cited affordability, climate and walkability benefits.
Opponents — a large contingent drawn from historic neighborhoods such as Willow and Encanto Palmcroft — urged delay, independent study or exemptions for historic districts. Speakers cited parking and infrastructure concerns, the potential for investor purchases, and limits to local design controls. Joanne Kaufman, a 39-year resident of the Willow Historic District, said, “We are respectfully requesting that the city council reconsider this plan and work to protect our viable and vibrant close‑knit neighborhoods.”
Councilwoman Kate Pastor moved to continue the items to Nov. 19 so staff and council could work through newly raised issues and request further analysis. The motion passed on a roll call vote with the councilmembers present voting in favor.
Council members and staff emphasized the tight state timeline but said the continuance would allow officials to address practical concerns such as design review, demolition stays in historic districts and potential short‑term‑rental uses of middle-housing units.
The council’s decision leaves the matter open for further amendments or clarifications at the Nov. 19 meeting and reflects a tension many cities face between complying with state mandates and responding to local preservation and infrastructure concerns.
