McKeesport community splits over whether to open high school football coaching job
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
Public comment at the Dec. 11 McKeesport Area School District board meeting centered on the future of the high school football coach, with some residents and staff defending Coach Matt Miller and others calling for the position to be opened to applicants.
Community debate over the McKeesport Area High School football program dominated the public-comment portion of the school board’s Dec. 11 meeting.
Supporters of the current staff, including assistant coach and math teacher Nick Lanigro, told the board the program provides extensive academic and personal support to players and disputed accusations made on social media. “I’m not related to coach Matt Miller, nor anyone, in fact, on the coaching staff at all,” Lanigro said, adding that coaches often provide out-of-duty support such as transporting students to college visits and emergency rooms.
Other speakers said the controversy reflects broader program concerns beyond wins and losses. One public commenter said the district must prioritize “life skills, discipline, [and] preparation for life after high school,” calling for systemic changes in how the program prepares students for adulthood.
Several residents urged transparency and a formal hiring process. A board member noted that the job should be opened and that the district owes the public an explanation of next steps, while acknowledging that an incumbent who reapplies could be considered.
Former/professional-level player and community member Kelly Gussin framed football as a lifeline for the city’s youth and said he is willing to lead the program: “When I look at these kids… I’m ready to be the head coach of McKeesport High School,” he said, urging investment in players beyond the scoreboard.
The board did not take a personnel vote on the coaching position during the meeting. Public commentators and staff members urged the board to weigh both program results and off-field supports when deciding whether to open the position or retain the incumbent.
The next procedural steps on coaching staff employment were not specified during the meeting; several commenters urged the board to use film review, broader evaluation criteria and community input before acting.
