Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Search And Seizure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee clarifies canine-search rules, breathalyzer use and extracurricular eligibility
Summary
The Lakeland policy committee refined search-and-seizure language (canine alerts, inspection witnesses, use of breathalyzers at dances) and recommended cross-references to extracurricular and searches policies; the package will go back to the board after confirming edits.
The committee reviewed the district’s searches and seizures and extracurricular-events provisions, focusing on canine searches, breathalyzer testing at dances, and eligibility rules for school-sponsored activities.
On canine searches the committee agreed that "a canine alert, which is determined by the canine's handler, constitutes reasonable suspicion." Members worked on wording to ensure fairness: when a canine alerts, "any suspected individual or individuals will be called to the scene to witness the inspection of the item or place the canine alerted to," while also acknowledging the difficulty of immediately identifying the owner of an alerted item.
The group debated the use of breathalyzers at extracurricular events. Unidentified Speaker 3 said breathalyzing at dances "is common practice and the right thing," and the committee drafted language that would allow breathalyzer testing at organized school-sponsored events. The draft includes a provision that "students who refuse a breathalyzer test will be denied admittance, and their parents will be notified." The committee emphasized that participation in extracurricular activities is a privilege, not a property right: several speakers refined the text to state that participation "is not a property, liberty, or contract right" and "shall be subject to higher standards for participation."
On physical searches the committee discussed definitions (wand vs physical pat-down) and agreed the policy should require at least one adult of the student's biological gender to be present for a physical search where practicable; when impractical, a second adult should be present and efforts made to provide an adult of the student's biological gender.
Committee members noted several cross-reference ambiguities in the draft (various references were made during discussion to policy numbers such as 3400, 3410, 3370) and requested the final draft confirm the correct policy numbers before the item returns to the board. The committee indicated the search-and-seizure package will likely go back to the board for final action once those clarifications and Megan’s input are added.
The transcript does not include a meeting date.
