Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DeKalb commissioners debate Charter Review recommendations, split over home rule vs. legislative package
Summary
DeKalb County's operations committee reviewed the Charter Review Committee report Dec. 2 and asked staff to return a clarified spreadsheet separating changes that can be made under home rule from those that would require legislative action or a referendum; commissioners disagreed over sequencing and inclusion of CEO comments.
Chair Marita Davis Johnson convened the operations committee and said the packet before the commissioners divides charter-review recommendations into items that likely can be handled under home rule and items that would require the legislature or a referendum. Staff attorney presenting the packet cautioned, "the devil's always in the details," saying precise wording will determine whether a change can be done locally or must go to the legislature.
Several commissioners pushed for clarity on whether the CEO's comments—including a suggestion to preserve the CEO's right to vote at Board of Commissioners meetings—had been incorporated. Commissioner Robert Patrick asked specifically whether the CEO's earlier suggestions on the presiding officer and the CEO's voting rights were captured; staff replied the CEO comments were in committee minutes but had not yet been integrated into the spreadsheet under discussion.
The central disagreement at the meeting concerned process. Some commissioners, including Commissioner Ted Terry and others, argued for prioritizing clean, technical home-rule changes that could be made quickly without a referendum. Commissioner Terry warned against spending the next year on referendum campaigns for what he described as minor cleanups. By contrast, legal staff and other commissioners urged caution, noting the Organizing Act functions as a single document and piecemeal changes risk internal conflicts. "Changing one section while there is a request pending in front of the legislature or the voters to potentially change another section... could potentially lead to conflict," an attorney advised.
After discussion, commissioners agreed staff should produce a revised document that (1) consolidates clear home-rule items, (2) identifies items that would require legislative action or referendum, and (3) incorporates CEO comments from the minutes. Commissioners asked staff to return this clarified packet ahead of the next Operations meeting on Dec. 9 or Dec. 16 so the committee could decide what to transmit to the legislative delegation and what to pursue locally.
The committee did not take a final vote on any charter-change language during the session; members asked for more detailed, item-by-item analysis before deciding whether to pursue changes under home rule or to request the legislature take up the complete package.
