Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Romulus council declines petition to vacate alley in Buckingham Manor after encroachment concerns

December 23, 2025 | Romulus, Wayne County, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Romulus council declines petition to vacate alley in Buckingham Manor after encroachment concerns
The Romulus City Council considered and rejected on Dec. 22 a petition to vacate a north-south alley in the Buckingham Manor subdivision.

The clerk read a full legal description of the alley (north of Cincinnati Avenue, south of Avalon Street, east of Essex Street and west of Chamberlain Drive, abutting lots 183–197 and 232–246). The petition asked the council to adopt a resolution vacating the alley while retaining a 20-foot utility easement for the City Department of Public Works to access utilities for repair and maintenance.

Council discussion focused on observed encroachments and enforcement differences depending on whether the alley remained a public right-of-way or was vacated to adjacent owners. DPW staff (Roberto) noted there were several addresses with structures or fences that had already encroached into the alley. He explained: "...if there's a no vote and the alley is not vacated, there will be enforcement...there's going to be one enforcement [for a specific fence that crossed property lines]; if the alley is vacated, the city would be hands off and property disputes would be between owners or in local court."

One councilmember said unanswered questions about handling property already in the alley were the reason for a 'no' vote. During the roll call, several members voted no; the chair recorded a no vote as well. The motion to adopt the vacate resolution failed on the record.

Vote summary (as recorded in the transcript roll call): Roscoe — no; Jones — yes; Wilhite — yes; Weisworth (Wadsworth/Weisworth variants) — no; Abdo — no; Bullock — yes; Chair — no. The clerk announced the motion failed.

What this means: the alley remains a city right-of-way, with the city indicating it will enforce current violations where appropriate. If owners bring private disputes later, those would proceed through ordinance enforcement or local court as appropriate.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Michigan articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI