Neighbors press commission on Riverview Villages PUD; developers offer concessions and hearing is continued
Loading...
Summary
Extensive public comment and commissioner questioning forced the Planning Commission to continue the rezoning/PUD application R2025-005 (Riverview Villages) to Jan. 26; the developer offered revisions including limiting multifamily buildings to six units, capping height at two stories/40 ft, a 20 ft rear-yard buffer adjacent to Riverview Estates, and a tree buffer.
The Newcastle Planning Commission on Dec. 8 continued its review of a proposed rezoning and planned unit development, R2025-005 (Riverview Villages), after several hours of staff presentation, technical questions and a lengthy public-comment period dominated by neighbors' safety, density and buffering concerns.
Staff introduced the PUD, saying the application would rezone about 77.33 acres along Northwest 32nd Street and Riverfront Drive for a mixed-use village with a commercial frontage along Highway 37 and residential/multifamily areas behind it. The plan includes variances to local subdivision code (reduced street widths, sidewalk requirements and certain lot-size restrictions), a proposed parkland area of about 15.28 acres, and design standards that call for Architectural Review Board approval before building permits.
During staff and applicant presentation, several technical issues were discussed: whether private shared access drives and access easements were adequately defined, the minimum pavement widths for private drives (applicant and staff agreed to clarify language and set a 20-foot minimum pavement width for private shared access drives), drainage adjacent to the Canadian River floodplain, and the need for a lift station to serve sewered portions of the project. The applicant said prior rounds of review included hydraulic modeling and preliminary traffic analysis; a full traffic-impact study must be completed at the final-plat stage.
Public testimony was strongly critical. Resident Charles Shell urged the commission to require turn lanes and sidewalks at the Highway 37 entrance because of documented daytime congestion and a prior pedestrian fatality. Multiple residents said the project’s scale and proximity conflicted with the existing low-density character of Riverview Estates and expressed concerns about buffering, 55-foot height allowances and multifamily units backing up to existing backyards.
In response the applicant and its consultants offered a set of concessions during the hearing: reduce the maximum multifamily building size from 12 units to 6 units per structure; cap multifamily heights at a maximum of two stories and 40 feet (down from 55 feet in the draft); add a minimum 20-foot rear-yard setback for multifamily lots adjacent to Riverview Estates; and install tree plantings (minimum spacing proposed at every 50 feet) within that buffer to better screen the development. Applicant representatives also said they would incorporate clearer PD language (correcting typos and inconsistent lot-size references) and that a full traffic study will be required at final plat and any traffic signal would be installed only if ODOT’s warrant thresholds are met.
Chair proposed continuing the item to the commission’s next meeting to allow staff and applicant to update PD language and compile commissioner questions; the commission voted to continue the PUD at the applicant’s request to the January 26 meeting and directed staff/applicant to coordinate revisions before that hearing.
The PUD remains under consideration, with a list of requested clarifications and the developer’s offered design limits to be reflected in a revised PD before the next public hearing.
