Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Supervision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court records show alleged restitution shortfall; Padilla later pleads true to a violation
Summary
Court papers and on-the-record statements show that the state alleged Rose Padilla remitted $2,504 against $81,135.98 owed under supervision; later in the docket she changed plea to 'true' on a violation and the state requested adjudication of guilt and consideration of long-term supervision.
The docket included two entries related to Rose Padilla’s supervision status and alleged violations. Earlier in the morning the state told the court it appears Padilla remitted $2,504 toward a restitution obligation totaling $81,135.98 that the state says was owed while she was on community supervision in Bexar County; Padilla pled "not true" to several violation allegations at that appearance and the court discussed scheduling a contested hearing in January.
Later in the session the court returned to Padilla’s matter and the record reflects the defendant entered a plea of "true" to violation of a condition (identified as condition 23 in Bexar County records). The state requested that the court grant the motion to enter adjudication of guilt and either revoke or place the defendant on community supervision for up to 20 years; the court paused to confirm the underlying offense (noting it appeared to be an aggravated-assault-with-a-deadly-weapon allegation) before proceeding further.
The transcript records the state's specific restitution numbers and the court’s discussion of possible contested hearing dates. The record does not show a final disposition in the excerpted segments beyond the plea change and the state’s request for adjudication; the judge asked for clarification on the charge before ruling.
