Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tariffs Trade topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members press witnesses on tariffs after testimony that trade talks began before tariff announcements
Summary
Members pressed witnesses about the timing and impact of recent U.S. tariffs on India and an added tariff on Russian oil that raised the effective rate to 50%, with witnesses saying negotiations predated some announcements and members warning the policy has damaged trust.
Get email alerts on the Tariffs Trade topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Sydney Kamlager‑Dove used her opening to criticize recent administration tariff and visa actions and to press witnesses on whether trade negotiations with India were already underway when the President announced tariffs. "Flush, flush, flush down the toilet...Singling out India for 50% tariffs...has effectively derailed leader level meetings," she said.
Dhruva Jaishankar, testifying in his personal capacity as an analyst, said public reporting indicated negotiations began before Feb. 13 and that an announcement was made on Aug. 6 using executive authority; he said the extra 25% (bringing the total to 50% in some lines) was imposed in September. "Based on what has been publicly reported, yes, the negotiations began before February 13," Jaishankar said. He added he did not know exactly how close the parties were at the time the tariffs were imposed but said by early July the sides had reached a deal that was close.
Members argued the tariff escalation complicated U.S. efforts to secure India as a reliable partner, with ranking members warning of long‑term strategic costs. Witnesses recommended that Congress consider tools to rebuild trust, including clearer trade negotiation signaling and using congressional authorities to incentivize reforms and cooperation. No formal policy change occurred at the hearing; members said they would continue oversight and solicitation of written answers from witnesses.

