Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedures Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Evanston Land Use Commission directs staff to redraft rules after debate on conditions and continuances
Summary
Commissioners debated proposed changes to the Land Use Commission—s rules—focusing on when members may propose conditions, how many continuances should be allowed, and remote attendance under the Open Meetings Act—and directed staff and the chair to return with revised language.
The Evanston Land Use Commission on Dec. 10 directed city staff and the chair to continue redrafting the commission—s rules and procedures after a lengthy debate over proposed language governing commissioner conditions, continuances and remote participation.
Staff presented a redlined draft packet the commission had previously reviewed on Oct. 8 and Nov. 12. Commissioners raised several substantive issues: whether the rules should require that a commissioner proposing a condition also vote in the affirmative for the project; how to prevent chaining of continuances across multiple hearings while preserving by-right continuances for property owners within the notice boundary; and whether liaison references and certain prospective-proposals language should be struck or revised.
Assistant City Attorney Kathy Penrose advised the commission that the Illinois Open Meetings Act limits allowable reasons for remote participation and that statutory language governs virtual attendance. Commissioners also discussed clarifying the agenda and the chair—s opening script so attendees understand the difference between sworn testimony for a case and general public comment.
On the question of conditions, the chair offered clarifying language that commissioners favored as a path forward: "A commissioner offering a condition related to one standard need not vote in favor of a project if he or she believes that other standards remain unmet." Commissioners asked staff and legal to redraft Section 10 to balance the desire to improve projects with concerns about piling on unrelated conditions.
Commissioners and legal staff debated continuance rules at length. Law staff recommended requiring written continuance requests and suggested referring to City Council a code change that would require by-right continuance requests to be presented at the initial hearing to prevent repeated continuances. Commissioners asked staff to propose clearer, reorganized language identifying the groups that may request continuances (property owners, applicants, residents/business owners within the notification area) and the procedural steps that would apply to each group.
After discussion, Commissioner Mangum moved to have city staff and the chair continue to review the Land Use Commission—s rules and procedures and return with updated language at a future meeting; the commission approved the motion by voice vote.
Next steps: staff will redraft the sections identified in the discussion, consult with legal on Open Meetings Act constraints, and return the revised packet for further commission review.
