Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Use Table Changes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Draft use table would tighten medical-office, car-dealership and supermarket rules; inclusionary-zoning bonuses flagged for review
Summary
Consultants proposed a consolidated use table and area/bulk tables that would change how several uses are regulated downtown — including limiting medical offices, treating car dealerships and gas stations as special-permit uses, and revisiting inclusionary-zoning bonuses and fee-in-lieu rules.
Consultants presented a proposed consolidated schedule of uses and accompanying conditions at the Dec. 15 subcommittee meeting and walked commissioners through categories where the draft would change existing practice.
Key proposals and commissioner reactions:
- Medical offices: The consultant recommended distinguishing medical offices from general offices because medical practices typically create higher parking demand and different operational impacts. Commissioners discussed caps (examples raised: 5,000 sq ft in retail, 10,000 sq ft in business zones) and the idea of making larger medical practices subject to site plan or special-permit review. Several commissioners favored keeping medical-office openings limited in retail frontage and using size limits to avoid large-scale clinics downtown.
- Car dealerships and automotive repair: BFJ suggested consolidating car-dealership rules and making new car dealerships a special-permit use. Commissioners also requested a separate definition for automotive repair and a special-permit path for automotive services that include outdoor storage or heavy equipment, and to prohibit outdoor storage of parts where appropriate.
- Supermarkets and grocery: The draft preserves a cap in business zones (existing practice noted at 30,000 sq ft) and proposed treating supermarkets that exceed thresholds as special-permit uses to manage traffic and loading impacts.
- Banks and drive-thrus: Commissioners recommended prohibiting drive-thrus in retail zones and allowing any bank drive-thru only by special permit in business zones; similar restrictions would apply to fast-food drive-thrus.
- Personal services, wellness and pet/veterinary care: Discussion focused on consolidating overlapping definitions (personal service vs. service establishment) and distinguishing veterinary care from human medical offices because overnight boarding and animal-care impacts differ. The group asked consultants to prepare clearer definitions and conditions.
- Outdoor dining and entertainment: Sidewalk cafes on municipal sidewalks are regulated by the sidewalk-cafe permit (administrative) and remain subject to staff review; outdoor entertainment (live music) should be removed from retail and allowed in business zones by special permit to manage noise and neighbor impacts.
- Inclusionary zoning: Practitioners asked if (1) the inclusionary fee should be waived for projects that already include affordable units, (2) the density-bonus cap (currently 130%) should be raised, and (3) density bonuses should be allowed for projects that pay a fee-in-lieu. Commissioners signaled support for exploring item (3) but asked BFJ to update fee calculations (current fees tied to SMI may not cover construction costs) and to bring legal checks on applying bonuses when fee-in-lieu is paid.
Why it matters: Changes to use categories and thresholds will affect what projects get permitted as-of-right versus which require site-plan or special-permit review, with implications for parking, traffic, and downtown character.
What’s next: BFJ will produce a revised use table and conditions sheet incorporating commissioners’ direction (definitions for medical, veterinary, car dealerships, and automotive repair; drive-thru restrictions; supermarket size caps) and return with an updated draft for Feb. 4 and a fuller inclusionary-zoning package at the next meeting.
