Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission conference hears strong demand for Mobile County bond offering; staff recommends acceptance
Summary
A presenter reported heavy demand for Mobile County bonds, a roughly 2.4x subscription and an all-in net interest cost near 3.96% for 20-year debt, and recommended the commission accept the underwriter's verbal offer and approve an authorizing resolution; the transcript records a motion and second but no vote tally.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A presenter at the Mobile County commission conference on Nov. 23 reported the county's recent bond offering drew strong investor demand and recommended commissioners accept the underwriter's verbal purchase offer and approve an authorizing resolution.
The presenter said rating agencies affirmed the county's credit as 'double A1' and 'double A plus stable,' which helped secure favorable pricing. He told the commission that the sale drew about $67,000,000 in orders for $27.5 million in bonds offered, producing roughly a 2.4-times subscription and allowing the team to negotiate lower yields in several maturities.
"We had very strong demand, over 67,000,000 in orders for 27 and a half million in bonds offered," the presenter said, adding that some maturities were under-subscribed and that the underwriter, Piper Sandler, was willing to purchase certain unsold pieces at the stated yields. He reported an all-in net true interest cost of about 3.96% for 20-year money, roughly eight basis points better than prior estimates.
The presenter said the county's financial advisers and the underwriter renegotiated yields and that a pricing memo provided to the commission documents where the teams agreed and where additional basis points were captured for the county.
Following the presentation, staff recommended accepting the underwriter's verbal offer and approving the authorizing resolution. The transcript records Speaker 3 moving to vote on placing the resolution on the agenda and Speaker 2 seconding the motion; the record in the provided transcript does not include a formal roll-call or final tally.
The discussion emphasized market conditions, underwriting support for under-subscribed maturities and the recommendation that the commission authorize the transaction; the commission is scheduled to consider the authorizing resolution at the forthcoming regular meeting.
Note on attribution: the transcript identifies the presenter only by speaker label (Speaker 2) and separately mentions the presence of 'Josh McCoy' from PFM; the transcript does not explicitly attach that name to the speaker turns in which the remarks above appear.

