Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Audit Contract topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves three-year extension with Baker Tilly for audit services

City committee (unnamed in transcript) · September 2, 2025

Summary

The committee approved a three-year extension of its auditing agreement with Baker Tilly for fiscal years 2025–2027 at a stated fiscal impact of $234,900; a member asked that the city examine its competitive-solicitation practices in a future agenda item.

The committee voted to extend its auditing agreement with Baker Tilly for three years, covering fiscal years 2025–2027, with a stated fiscal impact of $234,900. The extension was approved by voice vote after the item was presented.

A committee member raised a related policy concern before the vote, asking that staff place a future agenda item on city practice around competitive solicitations. "I just wanted to state that I think, this would be a future agenda item where the City really should always review and entertain anything competitive," the member said, and added that the suggestion was "not a judgment or reflection on the services that we're currently receiving from Baker Tilly." The comment was recorded as a request for a policy investigation rather than a complaint about the firm.

The motion to approve the extension was taken by voice vote; the transcript records a call for "aye" and affirmations from the dais but does not record a roll-call or individual member votes. The committee then moved on to other agenda business.

Next steps: staff will place the procurement-consistency item on a future agenda for discussion, according to members' remarks during the meeting.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source