Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Handbook topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norfolk County commissioners instruct counsel to revise vacation‑payout language in employee handbook
Summary
The commissioners voted to have labor counsel draft revised handbook language clarifying vacation allotment and payout on separation, moving to a July 1 allotment model for nonunion employees while preserving collective‑bargaining exceptions and existing carryover rules.
Norfolk County commissioners on Nov. 12 instructed labor counsel to draft revised language for the county employee handbook that clarifies how vacation time is allotted and paid out when employees separate from service. The change would make clear that vacation is credited on July 1 and that employees who separate after that date would be paid for accrued but unused vacation, consistent with existing carryover limits.
Director Cronin introduced the item and identified Human Resources Director Gerard Foye and labor counsel Peter Summers as the presenters. Summers said the proposed rewrite is meant to simplify the handbook and align the written policy with current practice. “The change here would be basically you earn it all at once on July 1 when it's allotted to you,” Summers said, describing the difference between earning vacation over the year (accrual) and receiving the allotment on a fixed date.
Gerard Foye, the county’s human resources director, added that the handbook applies to nonunion employees unless a collective bargaining agreement specifies otherwise and noted the handbook already allows employees to carry over up to 15 days of vacation. Commissioners asked for examples of mid‑year hires and separations; counsel and HR explained that under the proposed language an employee who leaves after July 1 would receive the allotment less any time already used, plus any allowed carryover.
A commissioner moved to instruct counsel to return with proposed language reflecting the discussion; the motion was seconded and approved on a voice vote. Counsel said he could present draft language as early as next week for a formal vote. The commission did not change collective‑bargaining agreements and noted that any applicable union contract provisions would remain controlling where they conflict with handbook language.
What happens next: Counsel will prepare the draft amendment to the employee handbook and present it to the commission for a future vote. If approved, the change will be implemented for handbook‑covered employees subject to any overriding collective bargaining terms.
