Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves audit, unpaid-meal policy and broadband RFP; tables long maintenance bid
Summary
The board approved the 2024–25 audit, adopted a revised unpaid-meal policy (policy 82 45), and accepted a broadband RFP aimed at E-rate reimbursement; the long maintenance/landscaping bid was tabled until January pending staff review of bid details.
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the action-agenda portion of the meeting the board recorded several formal votes and procedural outcomes.
Audit: Speaker 2 moved that the board approve the 2024–25 audit "as revised" and Speaker 1 seconded the motion. The board approved the audit by voice vote ('Aye'). No roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.
Policy: Speaker 1 moved and Speaker 2 seconded approval of revisions to policy referred to in the meeting as "82 45" concerning unpaid school meal charges; the board approved the revised policy by voice vote.
Broadband RFP: The board reviewed an RFP designed to qualify for E-rate reimbursement. Speaker 1 moved to accept the broadband RFP and Speaker 2 seconded; the motion passed on a voice vote. Staff said the RFP was written with E-rate eligibility in mind and that the district expects partial reimbursement.
Maintenance bid tabled: Earlier in the meeting staff presented three lawn/landscape bids: Alpine Lawn Care (estimated $48,000 for services described), Cougar Scapes (listed at $48,600 for 18 mowings) and a Golden Eagle/Guardian bid that listed $48,000 for weekly mowing plus an additional fall reduction mowing cost of $10,760 (total $59,180). The board voted (or agreed) to table the long maintenance bid until January so facilities staff can review equipment lists, line items and other details.
No contested roll-call vote details were recorded in the transcript; motions passed by voice vote where the minutes only captured 'Aye' responses. Where the transcript did not name a mover or a second, the article uses the board-member attributions present in the meeting record.

