Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Batch Plant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant withdraws request for Coppell concrete batch plant after staff opposes comp‑plan change
Summary
An Estrada Companies request for a special use permit to operate a concrete batch plant in Coppell was withdrawn during the Nov. 20 planning commission meeting after staff said the use conflicts with the city’s 2030 comprehensive master plan; the applicant said he will resubmit with clearer details.
The Coppell Planning and Zoning Commission on Nov. 20 accepted a withdrawal from Estrada Companies of a requested Special Use Permit (SUP 1270 LI) to run a concrete batch plant on about 4.47 acres north of East Beltline Road.
Staff had recommended denying the SUP and an accompanying future land‑use map amendment that would have changed the parcel’s designation from Urban Residential Neighborhood to Industrial Special District. Matt Steer, Development Services Administrator, told commissioners the use is “super high intensity” and does not match the 2030 Coppell Comprehensive Master Plan. He also said the property lacks public road frontage and would require platting and other engineering work before any permit could be issued.
The applicant, Phil Flink of Estrada Companies, told the commission his consultants were missing specific information needed to respond to staff and commissioner questions and asked for additional time. Flink said the company could consider a shorter, time‑limited approval if required, offering a potential sunset of “up to 60 months” while it operated on the site, but counsel and staff cautioned that a time‑limited SUP would be a different application requiring separate public notice.
Legal counsel and staff highlighted notice and procedural limits: changing the request from a full SUP to a limited (time‑bound) SUP would require new notices to property owners and published legal notice because the scope of the application would change. After discussing options — continuance, withdrawal and resubmittal — Flink opted to withdraw the application and said Estrada Companies intends to resubmit at a future filing cycle.
Commissioners had raised concerns about dust, noise, traffic, and wear on local roads if a batch plant operated on the site. Commissioners also noted state environmental permitting (TCEQ) applies to concrete batching operations but does not eliminate neighborhood impacts such as truck traffic and open‑air dust generation.
Next steps: the applicant indicated plans to resubmit with clearer parameters; staff said a new submittal would likely follow the city’s normal deadlines and procedures for public notice and review.
