Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning Liberty Pike topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission recommends disapproval of rezoning at 1211 and 1217 Liberty Pike after resident opposition

Franklin Municipal Planning Commission · December 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended disapproval of a request to rezone two Liberty Pike parcels to RC-4 because the request conflicts with Envision Franklin height guidance for one parcel; multiple nearby residents cited traffic, drainage and property-value concerns; the commission voted to recommend disapproval to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen.

The Franklin Municipal Planning Commission recommended that the Board of Mayor and Aldermen disapprove Ordinance 2025-51, a rezoning request to change two parcels at 1211 and 1217 Liberty Pike from General Office (GO) to Regional Commerce (RC-4).

Staff told the commission that Envision Franklin’s height map recommends a three-story maximum for 1217 Liberty Pike and a higher maximum for 1211; staff said the paired rezoning request did not meet the plan’s guidance and therefore recommended disapproval. Staff also flagged potential issues with frontage requirements, buffer and transition-zone impacts and stormwater compliance during future site plan review.

Three nearby residents — Lane Finch, Jay Ray and David Stewart — spoke during public comment. Finch said rezoning could turn a dead-end neighborhood into a traffic cut-through and bring noise and lighting onto properties. Ray cited tree clearing and drainage problems and warned of property-value impacts. Stewart said landscape requirements would be reduced under RC-4, worsening drainage and visual buffering.

Applicant representative Adam Kronk said office development had stalled in the market since 2020 and that RC-4 zoning would provide more viable retail or senior-living options. Commissioners debated the height map, buffer requirements and the absence of specific proposals from the applicant. A motion to approve the rezoning failed on a roll call, and the commission then voted to recommend disapproval to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen.

The commission’s recommendation is advisory; the Board of Mayor and Aldermen retains final approval authority.