Defense says courthouse victims monument biased jury; state calls claim waived and harmless

Summary

In oral arguments on appeal, defense counsel William Gill said a courthouse monument to "Sullivan County victims of violent crime" and related court speech conveyed partiality and exposed jurors; the state urged the court to affirm, saying the claim was waived and any exposure would be harmless given overwhelming evidence of guilt.

William Gill, an attorney with the Appellate Division of the Public Defender's Office, told an appellate panel that the core issue on appeal is "speech" — specifically the message sent by a courthouse monument and whether that message deprived Randall Neece of a trial before an impartial tribunal and jury.

Gill pointed to the monument outside the Sullivan County Justice Center, which his brief depicts as pillars inscribed to "Sullivan County victims of violent crime," and argued the monument communicated partiality toward victims. "A court's monuments and symbols are a form of speech," Gill said, urging that the monument's presence and visibility to jurors undercut the court's impartiality instructions.

A recurring line of questioning from the bench focused on exposure: whether any juror actually saw the monument and whether mere passage by a monument is enough to establish the constitutional exposure the defense must show. Gill…

Defense says courthouse victims monument biased jury; state calls claim waived and harmless

Summary

Subscribe to keep reading