Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Meals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews short-run data on suspended student meal fees; annualized cost could be roughly $180,000
Summary
After the board temporarily suspended parent-paid meal fees, the district tracked Nov. 5–25 meal participation and found an additional cost of $14,859 for 14 school days; staff and trustees asked for scenarios showing both the current-year fiscal impact and next-year budget options that would cover the parent portion and analyze grant/reimbursement effects.
The Exeter School District reported short-run data on the recent suspension of parent-paid student meal fees and asked district staff to prepare financial scenarios for the next board meeting.
Dahlia, the district's food-service director (name appears variously in the record), told trustees staff tracked program participation from Nov. 5 through Nov. 25 and calculated an added district cost of $14,859 for the 14-school-day period. "We tracked the cost to the district, which is a total of $14,859 to cover the cost of the meals that were taken by our students," the director said. Board members and administrators annualized that figure to estimate an additional cost of roughly $180,000 over a full school year if the same participation rate continued.
How it breaks down: staff said food-service revenue is built from federal, state and local (guardian) portions. Under the current proposal the food-service expense side is roughly $325,000; staff and trustees estimated the local (guardian) revenue not collected in the suspension period to be about $160,000 (approximate). Administrators said federal and state reimbursement for eligible free/reduced students would still be retained, but they cautioned that universal free meals can change families' application behavior for free/reduced status, which in turn can affect formula-driven grant calculations.
Trustees requested additional data: the board asked staff to pull DOE meal-claims forms (DOE 25 / MS-24) from the COVID era, when federal reimbursements were higher, to compare participation and revenue impacts; they also asked staff to research other districts that waived the guardian portion and to produce a scenario for both the remainder of the current year and for FY27 that models revenue, reimbursement and tax-rate impacts.
Process note: staff said that if the board chooses to continue suspending fees, the operation will increase the planned loss in the food-service fund and the operating fund would pick up the final negative balance at year-end; the board also asked whether using the Special Education Trust Fund to cover new special-education transportation costs would be permitted (staff will check trust language and report back).
Next steps: administrators will return with (1) current-year cost impacts of extending the suspension, (2) next-year budget scenarios showing the effect of covering the guardian portion on the MS-24 revenue reporting and on potential grant eligibility, and (3) DOE historical claim data and examples from other districts.
