Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shelbyville council reviews linked annexation and rezoning package for parcels near municipal airport and SR‑437
Summary
At a Dec. 2 study session, councilors reviewed multiple resolutions and first‑reading ordinances to annex and rezone parcels owned by Coy and Jane Landers, Richard M. and Christian B. Wilhelm, and Susie Cartwright Johnson; staff noted packet errors and a planning commission unfavorable recommendation for one multifamily proposal.
The Shelbyville mayor and council used their Dec. 2 study session to review a package of linked annexation resolutions and first‑reading rezoning ordinances for several parcels near the Shelbyville Municipal Airport and along State Route 437.
Council introduced resolutions to adopt plans of services for a 0.52± acre Landers parcel at 131 Hartshapel Road and for roughly 10.36± acres owned by Richard M. and Christian B. Wilhelm adjacent to the airport. Separately, staff presented a plan‑of‑services resolution for about 25.33± acres owned by Susie Cartwright Johnson along SR‑437; staff noted Shelbyville Power requested changing the plan language for sewer services from 'may' to 'will.'
Council also reviewed first readings of multiple rezoning ordinances tied to those annexations: a rezoning request at 503 Riverview Drive (Burled Pine Farms LLC) from R‑1 to R‑3; the Landers parcel from A‑1 to C‑2; Wilhelm parcels from agricultural/residential designations to Commercial 2; and two Cartwright Johnson parcels with requested C‑2 (commercial) and R‑4 (high‑density residential) designations. A council member reported the planning commission issued an unfavorable recommendation for the multifamily (R‑4) request, citing inconsistency with adjacent R‑2 single‑family lots and a comprehensive‑plan frontage requirement that the partial parcel did not meet.
Staff and councilors identified printing errors in the packet (acreage numbers reversed for D and E and a parcel partial number printed incorrectly); staff committed to correct the materials and notify the council. No formal votes were taken during the study session; items were presented for review and will return for formal action on subsequent agendas.
Councilmembers asked questions about compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, potential unit counts (planning staff referenced about 180 units as a theoretical maximum depending on green‑space provisions), and whether annexing the bypass right‑of‑way was appropriate; staff said they would verify right‑of‑way status and provide clarification to the council.
