Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yelm staff outline interlocal agreement with Thurston County ahead of proposed annexation
Summary
City staff presented an interlocal agreement with Thurston County that would set roles if the city later annexes about 320 parcels (~1,200 acres). Council was briefed on permit transfers, service continuity, outreach and a Jan. 16 ordinance timeline; formal approval will return next week.
Unidentified Speaker 3, a city staff presenter, told the Yelm City Council study session that the city and Thurston County drafted an interlocal agreement to govern responsibilities should the city pursue annexation of roughly 320 parcels covering about 1,200 acres. “This is the actual interlocal agreement that we're gonna be joining to you next week to get your, approval to have the mayor sign,” Unidentified Speaker 3 said.
The agreement, staff said, largely places record-keeping and infrastructure responsibilities with Thurston County while making the city responsible for any open permits within annexed areas; those permits would be processed under the county’s existing rules. Staff told council most parcels are 1-to-5-acre lots and do not expect a significant permit workload. The presenter also said that sewer or water connection would not be mandatory unless an individual system fails and a property lies within 200 feet of a sewer line.
Staff outlined a schedule of outreach and approvals: if council approves the interlocal next week, staff will publish a website with details, open an email sign-up for notifications, hold a public open house Dec. 23 from 6 to 8 p.m. at the community center, and bring an annexation ordinance to council on Jan. 16. If the ordinance is approved, the boundary review board would have a 45-day comment period before an annexation could take effect.
Council and staff discussed service and cost impacts. Unidentified Speaker 3 estimated property-tax changes tied to county road tax differences could amount to about $10 a month for affected properties. On roads and improvements, staff said most roadwork triggered by development would be built to city standards by developers; city-funded projects would be considered when grants or sufficient development made them priorities.
Unidentified Speaker 3 said staff prepared a three-page FAQ packet to be mailed to property owners in the proposed area and emphasized that approving the interlocal does not itself annex property. The city will return next week with the formal interlocal agreement for council action.
