Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Graduation Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Northshore: Graduation rates steady but disparities prompt closer monitoring
Summary
District leaders told the board that overall on‑time graduation rates remain robust and generally above state averages, but demographic breakdowns show persistent disparities that the district will monitor and target with supports.
Northshore School District officials presented their Goal 5 monitoring report, saying the district’s on‑time graduation rate remains broadly strong though 2025 shows a slight dip from 2024 that presenters attributed to sampling variation and pandemic‑era waiver effects. Dr. Craig Foster, director of research and evaluation, said the slide deck shows a ‘‘fairly normal graduation rate for us’’ and that small year‑to‑year changes are often within expected error.
Board members asked for apples‑to‑apples comparisons with pre‑pandemic years; a board member noted the district’s ‘‘GRU waivers’’ during the pandemic likely boosted earlier percentages and asked staff to compare 2018–2019 rates to the current figures. Dr. Foster agreed to provide further context and cautioned against overreacting to single‑year quirks, saying the district will monitor patterns over time for meaningful trends.
Presenters also flagged disproportionate outcomes among some student groups. Dr. Foster and other speakers pointed to consistent gaps in specific demographic slices (race/ethnicity and other groups) even as gender differences were minor. Board members and staff discussed possible contributors including cohort differences, larger subgroup sizes (which change the distribution), adult transition students who may remain in the program beyond typical timelines, and student transiency.
Staff noted adult transition program students are counted in the on‑time graduation rate and that nearly 80 such students currently could affect year‑to‑year percentages. Board members asked whether the district could calculate an adjusted ceiling (excluding certain long‑term transition populations) to set realistic targets; staff said they can explore alternate rate calculations using available data.
The district emphasized that, despite these disparities, much of the work to improve graduation is focused at the individual level — counselors’ personal learning plans for seniors, targeted school action plans and MTSS work — rather than sweeping systemwide changes for a single anomalous year. The board asked staff to follow up with additional cross‑year comparisons and to report back if persistent patterns emerge.
