Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Seffner rezoning request for commercial‑intensive use draws opposition over community plan consistency

Hillsborough County Zoning Hearing Master · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A rezoning request (RZ25‑1281) to change two parcels to Commercial Intensive (CI) along Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard drew a virtual public commenter who said the change conflicts with the Seffner‑Mango Community Plan; staff recommended approval subject to a companion comprehensive plan amendment and use restrictions.

Todd Pressman described RZ25‑1281 as a request to rezone two parcels from CG to CI in the General Seffner area, adjacent to a radio tower complex and existing higher‑intensity uses. Development Services (Logan McCaig) and Planning Commission staff (Melissa Lionheart) said the site is already surrounded by a mix of industrial, commercial and utility uses and found the rezoning approvable subject to the companion comprehensive plan amendment (CPA 205331).

A virtual opponent, Grace McComas, told the Hearing Master she opposes CI rezoning east of State Road 579, arguing it runs counter to the Seffner‑Mango Community Plan that discourages commercial encroachment into residential areas east of that road and prefers commercial clustering in urban service areas. She asked the hearing officer to recommend denial. The applicant’s rebuttal clarified the intended limited uses (furniture refinishing and repair, not boat construction or large‑scale marine repair) and referenced restrictions proposed in the application.

Staff and planning commission presentations emphasized that the light industrial/commercial pattern already exists along Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and that the requested CI designation aligns with the corridor’s intended transportation/service role. The hearing record will be forwarded to the land use board with the land use hearing officer’s recommendation.