Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Clubs Turning Point Usa topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Students tell Lee's Summit R‑VII board Club America/Turning Point USA presence raises equity concerns
Summary
Two Lee's Summit North students told the Lee's Summit R‑VII board that a Club America chapter affiliated with Turning Point USA raises concerns about racism and exclusion; students cited past protests and quoted social-media material they said showed discriminatory language. The board did not respond during the meeting per policy BDDH.
Two students from Lee's Summit North High School used the board's public comment period to urge the Lee's Summit R‑VII Board of Education to scrutinize a newly established Club America chapter they said is tied to Turning Point USA.
Eldiana Lewis identified herself as a Lee's Summit North student and said she was concerned that Club America, described in the meeting as "powered by TP USA," could carry a legacy she characterized as "racist, homophobic and misogynistic," and asked what safeguards the district will use to prevent exclusion of minority students. "Does an affiliation with TP USA stand against everything the LSR 7 district promises for its students?" she asked.
Brandon True Love, a junior and president of the Black Student Union at Lee's Summit North, told the board he and other students had opposed a Club America chapter at Lee's Summit West in 2022 and said that incident led to protests. He quoted what he said were prior social-media posts and internal messages tied to people affiliated with TPUSA as evidence of discriminatory language. "If I'm being honest, that concerns me," he said, summarizing what he described as a pattern of remarks and conduct he finds incompatible with the district's nondiscrimination commitments. He also quoted a passage he attributed to the group's founder about black pilots: "if I see a black pilot, I'm gonna be like, boy, I hope he's qualified." He further read what he described as an internal message from a former staffer: "I hate black people, like, f them all... I hate blacks, period. End of story."
The board stated procedural limits on public comment at the outset of the period, reading board policy BDDH, which restricts speakers to pre-registered individuals, three minutes each, and states the board does not respond to public comments during the meeting except to ask clarifying questions. No board member made a substantive response to the students' allegations during the meeting and no administrative action was announced on the record.
The student speakers asked the board to clarify what oversight or conditions would be applied to school clubs with outside affiliations. The speakers framed their concerns as both a matter of student safety and alignment with district values; the transcript records their statements and the board's policy reading but does not record any board reply or proposed next steps during the meeting.
What happens next: the board's public comment rules require the administration to note comments and, "if appropriate," discuss follow-up with the superintendent; the transcript notes that but does not show any follow-up being directed at the meeting's close.
