Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Leavenworth council narrows legislative priorities after heated debate over lodging‑tax use for housing

Leavenworth City Council · November 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members debated whether to use existing lodging-tax revenue for housing or to pursue a new tourist-targeted fee or state-level reforms; after discussion the council amended its legislative-priority language to favor pursuing additional taxing authority or fees for housing and reordering priorities for clarity.

Council engaged in a lengthy debate about whether existing lodging-tax (hotel/motel) revenue should be used to support workforce housing or whether the city should press the state for new authorities.

Staff framed the issue as a response to a persistent housing shortage in Leavenworth that local leaders say is driven by a high-tourism economy and a local housing stock increasingly occupied as second homes. One proposal under discussion would allow a modest bonding program repaid with lodging-tax receipts; another would add a new, narrowly targeted fee on lodging to generate housing revenue. Some councilmembers argued that appropriating existing lodging-tax money for housing would be legally risky and could trigger litigation; others cited an attorney-general opinion that permits certain lodging-tax uses for housing in specific circumstances.

Councilmember Anne (Speaker 8) urged caution and recommended the council prioritize state-level reforms (including options for second-home taxation) rather than repurposing currently appropriated lodging-tax funds. Other councilmembers favored adding a carefully structured legislative request to pursue an additional lodging- or sales‑tax line dedicated to housing, phrased as a request for new authority rather than an immediate reallocation of existing dollars. After debate, the council amended and approved its legislative-priorities resolution to (a) reorder bullets so state-level fixes are emphasized, and (b) reword the lodging-tax language to ask the administration and legislative liaisons to pursue authority for an additional targeted fee or tax for housing and flexibility to serve households up to 120% of area median income.